Watson

(PS) Ehrenreich v. Watson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20202:20-cv-02215California1,571 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RYAN STEPHEN EHRENREICH, No. 2:20–CV–2215 JAM KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP AND STAYING CASE; and 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

14 MICHAEL WATSON, (ECF No. 1, 2, 3) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, has requested leave to proceed in 18 forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.)1 Plaintiff’s application in support of 19 his request to proceed in forma pauperis makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 20 Accordingly, the court grants plaintiff’s request to proceed without paying the filing fee. 21 The determination that a plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the 22 required inquiry. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the court is directed to dismiss the case at any 23 time if it determines that the allegation of poverty is untrue, or if the action is frivolous or 24 malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.