(PC) Harris. v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20201:20-cv-00007California2,389 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 DEVON DANTE HARRIS, JR., Case No. 1:20-cv-00007-EPG (PC)

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

12 v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

BE DISMISSED

13 USA, et al., (ECF No. 17) 14 Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

15

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

16

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

17 DISTRICT JUDGE 18 Devon Dante Harris, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on October 28, 20 2019. (ECF No. 1). On June 2, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it 21 failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 11). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to 22 either “(a) File a first amended complaint attempting to cure the deficiencies identified in [the 23 screening] order; or (b) Notify the Court in writing that he wishes to stand by the complaint as 24 written, in which case the undersigned will issue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.