Uribe

Uribe v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20201:19-cv-01702California206 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9} MARYLOU URIBE, Case No. 1:19-cv-01702-AWI-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 | WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

13 Defendants. (ECF No. 8) 14 15 On November 16, 2020, a stipulation was filed to dismiss this action with prejudice with 16 | the parties to bear their own costs and fees. (ECF No. 8.) In light of the stipulation of the 17 | parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San 18 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an 19 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 21 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.