Clear Connection Corporation v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20202:12-cv-02910California5,453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEAR CONNECTION No. 2:12-cv-02910-TLN-DB CORPORATION, a California corporation, CLEAR CONNECTION, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, and KURK MOODY, an individual, ORDER Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant. 15 v.

COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 Defendant/Counterclaim ant.

20 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Counter-Claimant Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC’s (“Comcast”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 103.) Counter-Defendants Clear Connection Corporation (“Clear”), Clear Connection, LLC (“Clear LLC”), and Kurk Moody (“Moody”) filed an opposition (ECF No. 117), and Comcast filed a reply (ECF No. 143). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Comcast’s motion. /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On January 1, 2009, Comcast and Clear entered into a Preferred Vendor Agreement (“PVA”). (ECF No. 117-1 at ¶ 1.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.