Eldridge
(PC) Uhuru v. Eldridge
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, No. 2:19-cv-1119 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 LAURA ELDRIDGE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed July 29, 2020, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status was revoked, and he 18 was ordered to pay, within thirty days, the $400.00 filing fee, and was cautioned that failure to do 19 so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. That time period has now 20 expired, and plaintiff has not paid the court’s filing fee, or otherwise responded to the court’s 21 order.1 22 //// 23
24 1 Instead, plaintiff filed an appeal. On October 16, 2020, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because plaintiff had 25 sustained three or more actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, and had not alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury. Uhuru v. Eldridge, No. 26 20-16736 (9th Cir. Oct.…