Sahota

(PC) Lear v. Sahota

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20202:18-cv-03099California1,945 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, No. 2:18-cv-3099 MCE DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PREETRANJAN SAHOTA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983. On screening plaintiff’s complaint, this court found plaintiff alleged the following claims: 19 (1) deliberate indifference to his medical needs for the failure of defendants Sahota, Buckman, 20 and Uddin to provide plaintiff accommodations, including a walker and wheelchair, for his 21 mobility problems; (2) excessive force against defendants Vela, Cross, Porter, and Adivincula; 22 and (3) violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act 23 (“RA”) against defendant California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”). (See ECF No. 10.) 24 Before the court is the motion to compel responses to interrogatories of defendant Sahota. 25 Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion. For the reasons set forth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.