Brooks
Brooks v. Bank of San Francisco
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 VALERIE BROOKS, individually and No. 2:20-cv-01366-WBS-CKD on behalf of all others 13 similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
15 v. 16 BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, a California corporation; and DOES 17 1 to 10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiff Valerie Brooks (“plaintiff” or “Brooks”) 22 brought this action against Bank of San Francisco (“defendant” or 23 “Bank of San Francisco”) and Does 1 through 101 seeking damages 24 related to defendant’s alleged violations of the Americans with 25
26 1 The Doe defendants have not appeared and there is no indication as to who they are. Accordingly, the court will refer 27 to Bank of San Francisco as the sole defendant for purposes of this order. 28 1 Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., and the 2 Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civil Code § 51 et seq. Plaintiff’s 3 Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses…