Brooks
Brooks v. Bank of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 VALERIE BROOKS, individually and No. 2:20-cv-01366-WBS-CKD on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO STRIKE
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
v. BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO, a California corporation; and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Valerie Brooks (“plaintiff” or “Brooks”) brought this action against Bank of San Francisco (“defendant” or “Bank of San Francisco”) and Does 1 through 101 seeking damages related to defendant’s alleged violations of the Americans with
26 The Doe defendants have not appeared and there is no indication as to who they are. Accordingly, the court will refer to Bank of San Francisco as the sole defendant for purposes of this order. 28 Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., and the Unruh Civil Rights Act, Cal. Civil Code § 51 et seq. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses…