City of West Sacramento v. R & L Business Management

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ----oo0oo---- 12 13 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, No. 2:18-cv-00900 WBS EFB CALIFORNIA; and PEOPLE OF THE 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 15 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT YOLO

16 v. COUNTY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

17 R AND L BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, a California corporation, f/k/a 18 STOCKTON PLATING, INC., d/b/a CAPITOL PLATING INC., a/k/a 19 CAPITOL PLATING, a/k/a CAPITAL

PLATING; CAPITOL PLATING, INC.,

20 a dissolved California corporation; et al., 21 Defendants. 22

23 ----oo0oo---- 24 Plaintiffs City of West Sacramento, California and the 25 People of the State of California (collectively, “the City”) 26 brought this action to address toxic levels of soil and 27 groundwater resulting from the release of hazardous substances at 28 1 a property once occupied by a metal plating facility at 319 3rd 2 Street, West Sacramento, California. (See Third Am. Compl. 3 (“TAC”) (Docket No. 45).) The City sued a number of defendants 4 under…