Darnell

(PC) Colbourn v. Darnell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20202:20-cv-01937California396 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ORRIN TYLER COLBOURN, No. 2:20-cv-1937 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JESS DARNELL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a Butte County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 13, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is 19 required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to 20 amend. 21 In response to the court’s order, plaintiff filed three separate amended complaints. As 22 plaintiff was informed in the October 13, 2020 order, Local Rule 220 requires that an amended 23 complaint be complete in itself without reference to any other pleadings. This is because, as a 24 general rule, an amended complaint supersedes a previous one. See Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 25 57 (9th Cir. 1967). 26 Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s amended, second amended and third amended 27 complaints will be dismissed with leave to file a fourth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.