Alencastre

(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20202:17-cv-01326California663 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, Case No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

12 v. MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY, AND

DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A

13 UNITED STATES MARSHALS, et al., RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

14 Defendants. ECF Nos. 151-154 15

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

16

17 18 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel with this action brought under 19 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff has filed a renewed motion 20 for appointment of counsel, two discovery related motions, and a motion to modify the 21 scheduling order. ECF Nos. 151-154. 22 With respect to her motion for appointment of counsel, plaintiff again fails to demonstrate 23 that appointing counsel is warranted. Plaintiff has been notified on several occasions that she 24 does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.