Alencastre

(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20202:17-cv-01326California663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, Case No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

v. MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY, AND

DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO FILE A

UNITED STATES MARSHALS, et al., RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants. ECF Nos. 151-154

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel with this action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff has filed a renewed motion for appointment of counsel, two discovery related motions, and a motion to modify the scheduling order. ECF Nos. 151-154. With respect to her motion for appointment of counsel, plaintiff again fails to demonstrate that appointing counsel is warranted. Plaintiff has been notified on several occasions that she does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, see Rand v. Rowland, 113 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.