Moore

(PC) Combs v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20201:19-cv-00390California662 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 DASHAWN WILSON COMBS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00390-NONE-BAM (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A SPEEDY TRIAL AND DEADLINE

11 v. SCHEDULES 12 MOORE, et al., (ECF No. 37) 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Dashawn Wilson Combs (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 16 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 17 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Moore, Ruelas, Brubaker, Ronquillo, and 18 Perez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and for deliberate indifference to 19 medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 20 On January 16, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that 21 Plaintiff failed to exhaust his prisoner administrative remedies as required by the Prisoner 22 Litigation Reform Act. (ECF No. 23.) After the motion was fully briefed, Defendants filed a 23 motion for a stay of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.