Chavez
Chavez v. Arias
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 RORY CHAVEZ, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0603 - JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE ) WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE 13 v. ) IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
THE COURT’S ORDER
) 14 GILBERTO ARIAS, et al., )
15 Defendants. ) ) 16
17 Previously, Plaintiff notified the Court that “a settlement has been reached… between Plaintiff 18 and Defendant Mayra R. Paniagua, only,” and dismissal documents were anticipated within 60 days. 19 (Doc. 46) Based upon the information provided, the Court ordered: “The stipulation to dismiss the 20 action as to Ms. Paniagua SHALL be filed no later than November 16, 2020.” (Doc. 47 at 1, 21 emphasis in original) To date, however, the parties have not filed the stipulation to dismiss the claims 22 against Ms. Paniagua. 23 The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide: “Failure of counsel or of a 24 party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by…