Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK THOMAS MCCOMBS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00712-DAD-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDER

S. SHERMAN, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. On August 26, 2020, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff, within 21 days, to file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading. (Doc. 10.) The Court granted Plaintiff a 30-day extension of time to comply with the screening order on September 26, 2020. (Doc. 12.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with … any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions … within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts…