Diaz

(PC) Sandoval v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20201:20-cv-01374California570 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIO SANDOVAL, Case No. 1:20-cv-01374-NONE-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL RALPH M. DIAZ, et al. (ECF No. 10) Defendants.

Plaintiff Julio Sandoval (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he is unable to afford counsel; his imprisonment limits his ability to litigate properly; the issues involved in this case are complex and require significant research and investigation; Plaintiff currently has no access to the law library due to the COVID-19 outbreak; a trial in this case will likely involve conflicting testimony 22 and counsel would be able to present adequate evidence and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.