Santoro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN R. ARRANT, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01253-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) RECONSIDERATION/CLARIFICATION, AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

K

ELLY SANTORO, et al., ) ) R CE LACO IMM SM AE NN DD DIN EG F ED NIS DM AI NS TS SA L OF CERTAIN Defendants. ) ) (ECF Nos. 11, 12) )

Plaintiff Melvin R. Arrant is proceeding pro se and in forma pauepris in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2020, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated separate claims for retaliation against Defendant Lozano, Garcia, Dodson, Herrera, Valdez, Felix, Florez, and Chanelo, and separate excessive force claims against Defendants Florez and Tapia. (ECF No. 11.) However, Plaintiff was advised that he failed to state any other cognizable claims. (Id.) Therefore, Plaintiff was advised that he could…