Alardo

(PC) Taylor v. Alardo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20202:19-cv-02241California521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON TAYLOR, No. 2:19-cv-2241 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS J. ALARDO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants used excessive force against him in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. On March 30, 2020 a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) was filed on behalf of defendants Alardo, Martin, and Ochoa. (ECF No. 20.) By order dated June 19, 2020, the undersigned informed plaintiff that failure to file a written opposition or statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of defendants’ motion. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff was directed to file an opposition or statement of no opposition within sixty days. Those sixty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an opposition, statement of //// 27 1 Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.