Lucero
Lucero v. Pennella
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20201:18-cv-01448California4,561 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MANUEL ROBERT LUCERO, Case No. 1:18-cv-01448-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
TERMINATING SANCTIONS
ANTHONY ROBERT PENNELLA, et al., (ECF Nos. 56, 57, 58) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 I. INTRODUCTION Manuel Robert Lucero (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that after transferring from Massachusetts to California to serve his post-conviction supervised release, he was improperly placed on parole rather than probation as ordered by the sentencing judge in Massachusetts, and that special conditions of parole were improperly applied to Plaintiff. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims due to Plaintiff’s failure …