(PC)Saiz
(PC)Saiz v. Putnam
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 8 MARTIN SAIZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01231-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED PUTNAM and SCHRIEBER, OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN Defendants. FOURTEEN DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE Martin Saiz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his complaint on August 31, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 6). The Court found that Plaintiff’s complaint “states cognizable claims against Defendants Putnam and Schrieber for (1) violating his due process rights with respect to housing him in administrative segregation and (2) violating his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for his protected speech.” (Id. at 9-10). The Court…