Chefalo

(PC) Ray v. Chefalo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20201:20-cv-01515California654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., 1:20-cv-01515-AWI-GSA-PC

12 Plaintiff, ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED vs. ON NOVEMBER 2, 2020 (ECF No. 6.)

S. CHEFALO,

15 Defendant.

23 Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 2, 2020, the court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on October 27, 2020 be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full before proceeding with this action. (ECF No. 6.) In the findings and recommendations, the court stated that “on three prior occasions, Plaintiff has brought actions while incarcerated that were dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” (Id. at 3 ¶ 3A.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.