Doe

(PC) Anderson v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20201:20-cv-01620California1,248 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HECTOR CLARENCE ANDERSON, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01620-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ) THIS ACTION

JOHN DOE, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF NOT BE Defendant. ) ALLOWED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ) IN THIS ACTION )

Plaintiff Hector Clarence Anderson is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the instant action on November 16, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. For the reasons discussed below, the Court recommends that Plaintiff not be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis and that Plaintiff instead be required to pay the filing fee if he wishes to proceed with this action. /// ///

1 However, on November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.