Madariaga

(PS) Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Madariaga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20202:19-cv-02432California2,326 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FREEDOM MORTGAGE No. 2:19-cv-2432 MCE DB PS

CORPORATION,

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. CHRISTINA MADARIAGA, and SIELA

MADARIAGA,

16 Defendants. 18 Defendant Christina Madariaga is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). (ECF No. 11.) Pending before the undersigned is plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 22.) For the reason explained below, the undersigned recommends that plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Freedom Mortgage Corporation (“FMC”) commenced this action on December 4, 2019, by filing a complaint and paying the applicable filing fee. The complaint alleges that on October 2, 2015, plaintiff became the loan servicer for a note secured by deed of trust for real property owned by defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.