Debbie

(PS) Tanksley v. Debbie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20202:20-cv-01875California1,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOODY WOODROW TANKSLEY, No. 2:20–cv–1875–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v. (ECF No. 4) DEBBIE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against defendants alleging a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for being refused medical treatment by a private health care facility; he also requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP request and dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was given 28 days to amend the complaint and was warned that a failure to do so by the required deadline “may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).” (Id. at 3.) When that deadline passed with no filings from plaintiff, the Court on October 30, 2020, issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.