Starr

(PC) White-Soto v. Starr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20201:19-cv-00457California579 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 YASYN WHITE-SOTO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00457-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND

v. SCHEDULING ORDER STARR, et al., (ECF No. 43) Defendants. 13 Plaintiff Yasyn White-Soto (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Starr for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On January 9, 2020, the Court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order setting the deadline for filing all dispositive motions (other than a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust) for November 19, 2020. (ECF No. 21.) On June 18, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. (ECF No. 33.) The motion is not yet fully…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.