Lizzaraga

(PC) Henderson v. Lizzaraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20202:18-cv-02181California1,381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., No. 2:18-CV-2181-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JOE LIZZARAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 87, to compel discovery previously ordered by the Court and for sanctions. Defendants have not filed an opposition. On August 4, 2020, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery in part, and directed Defendants to “produce documents responsive to plaintiff’s RFP No. 10, as narrowed by this order, within 30 days. . . .” ECF No. 71. Regarding RFP No. 10, the Court stated:

Plaintiff’s request for production could potentially be construed as overly broad. Plaintiff seeks documents in defendants’ personnel files throughout an undefined period of time. Plaintiff claims this request is relevant to his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.