Bobbala

(PC) Woody v. Bobbala

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 20, 20202:20-cv-01911California488 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN F. WOODY, No. 20-cv-1911 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MANJULA BOBBALA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 14, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint which the court now screens. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). In his amended complaint, as in the original, plaintiff complains about medical care he received for broken bones in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.