Diaz

(PC) Lipsey v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20201:20-cv-01010California774 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., 1:20-cv-01010-DAD-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, vs. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDER

R. DIAZ, et al., (ECF No. 6.)

15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS

18 Christopher Lipsey, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action. On July 21, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On September 29, 2019, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action in full within thirty days under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 6.) The thirty-day time period has now expired and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.