Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Black Lives Matter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 23, 20201:20-cv-01165California810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR, No. 1:20-cv-01165-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME, ADOPTING

BLACK LIVES MATTER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS

16 (Doc. Nos. 3, 4, 8)

18 Plaintiff Brandon Alexander Favor is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 15, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied on the grounds that his application did not establish indigency under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and, alternatively, that he is subject to the three strikes bar under § 1915(g). (Doc. No. 4.) Specifically, as to the latter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.