Rouse
(PC) Hunter v. Rouse
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER, No. 2:20-cv-0159 WBS DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROUSE, et al., Defendant. 15 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated May 15, 2020, the United States District Judge assigned to this action found plaintiff had accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) prior to filing the present action, denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and directed plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within forty-five days. Those forty-five days have passed, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or requested additional time to pay the filing fee. Plaintiff has however filed a motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 25) and a motion for court order regarding monetary damages (ECF No. 26). The court will address those motions and plaintiff’s motion regarding imminent danger (ECF No. 15) as set forth below. …