(PS) Osborne v. Tracy Police Dept
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE OSBORNE, No. 2:20-cv-1805-JAM-KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 9, 12, 18.) TRACY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. 16 On October 30, 2020 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 18), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On November 13, 2020, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 19), which have been considered by the court. This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court assumes…