Johnson v. City of Atwater

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20201:18-cv-00920California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD DEAN JOHNSON, et al., No. 1:18-cv-00920-DAD-SAB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

CITY OF ATWATER, et al., SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF PROSECUTION AND FAILURE TO

Defendants. OBEY COURT ORDERS 16 17 18 On July 8, 2018, plaintiffs Richard Dean Johnson and Lori Johnson (collectively, “plaintiffs”) commenced this action against defendants City of Atwater, Samuel Joseph, Jim Price, and Deol Lakhwinder (collectively, “defendants”). (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiffs’ complaint asserts federal claims—violations of their First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights— brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as various state law claims. (See generally id.) On August 21, 2019, the undersigned vacated the pretrial conference set for September 30, 2019, and the jury trial set for December 3, 2019, pending the court’s ruling on defendant Lakhwinder’s motion for summary judgment. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.