Pizana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL PIZANA, individually and on No. 1:18-cv-00644-DAD-SKO behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR v. RECONSIDERATION OF THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OCTOBER 15,

SANMEDICA INTERNATIONAL LLC, 2020 ORDER

15 Defendant. (Doc. Nos. 82, 84, 97, 100)

17 This matter is before the court on defendant SanMedica International, LLC’s request for reconsideration1 of two aspects of the assigned magistrate judge’s discovery order of October 15, 2020 (Doc. No. 97), granting plaintiff’s motion to compel in part and denying defendant’s motions for protective orders. (Doc. No. 100 at 3–8.) In its request for reconsideration, defendant also sought an additional thirty days to produce a privilege log (id. at 8–9), which the undersigned granted on November 10, 2020. (Doc. No. 103.) For the reasons set forth below, the remainder of defendant’s request for reconsideration will be…