Starr

(PC) White-Soto v. Starr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20201:19-cv-00457California1,113 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YASYN WHITE-SOTO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00457-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. (ECF No. 38)

STARR, et al., ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (ECF No. 33)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Yasyn White-Soto (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Starr for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On June 18, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. (ECF No. 33.) Following an extension of time, Plaintiff’s opposition was due on or before August 31, 2020. (ECF No. 41.) On July 8, 2020, during…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.