Hosey
(PC) Ray v. Hosey
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20201:20-cv-01076California2,063 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., 1:20-cv-01076-DAD-GSA-PC
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS BE
vs. REVOKED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)
AND PLAINTIFF BE REQUIRED TO
K. HOSEY, et al., PAY THE FILING FEE IN FULL
WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS
19 I. BACKGROUND Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 1.) On August 10, 2020, the court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis with this case. (ECF No. 5.) II. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. Section 1915(g) provides that 28 …