Hosey

(PC) Ray v. Hosey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20201:20-cv-01076California2,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 EDWARD VINCENT RAY, JR., 1:20-cv-01076-DAD-GSA-PC

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS BE

vs. REVOKED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

AND PLAINTIFF BE REQUIRED TO

K. HOSEY, et al., PAY THE FILING FEE IN FULL

WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

19 I. BACKGROUND Edward Vincent Ray, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 1.) On August 10, 2020, the court granted Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis with this case. (ECF No. 5.) II. THREE-STRIKES PROVISION OF 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) 28 U.S.C. § 1915 governs proceedings in forma pauperis. Section 1915(g) provides that 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.