Sinclair

(PS) Spencer v. Sinclair

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20202:20-cv-01266California1,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAMUEL R. SPENCER, No. 2:20-cv-01266 TLN AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT F. SINCLAIR, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 (ECF No. 35) and plaintiff’s two motions to amend the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59 (ECF Nos. 36 and 37). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and accordingly the motions were referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). For the reasons that follow, all three motions should be DENIED. I. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 24, 2020 and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. On September 3, 2020, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that this case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction without leave to amend. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.