1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANGEL ISAIS, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-01312-SAB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

13 v. ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDERS

14 FCA US LLC,

SEVEN DAY DEADLINE

15 Defendant.

16 17 On November 9, 2020, the parties filed a stipulation to extend time for dispositional 18 docunments to be filed in this action and an order issued requiring dispositional documents to be 19 filed on November 23, 2020. 20 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 21 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 22 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 23 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 24 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 25 2000). 26 Here, the parties filed a notice of settlement on July 24, 2020, and the deadline to file 27 dispositional documents has been continued twice at the stipation of the parties. The current 28 deadline to file has passed and the parties have not filed dispositive documents. 1 Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE IN 2 | WRITING within seven (7) days of the date of entry of this order why sanctions should not issue 3 | for the failure to file dispositive documents in compliance with the November 10, 2020 order. 4 | The parties are forewarned that the failure to show cause may result in the imposition of 5 | sanctions. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF a Se g | Dated: _November 25, 2020_ ef 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28