Bell v. NuSil Technology, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20201:20-cv-00061California444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHAN BELL, individually and on behalf of ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-0061 - JLT members of the general public similarly ) situated, ) ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE ) WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE Plaintiff, ) IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

THE COURT’S ORDER

v. ) ) NUSIL TECHNOLOGY LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

On November 9, 2020, the Court issued an order granting in part Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendants to supplement their initial disclosures. (Doc. 26) At that time, the Court ordered: “No later than November 23, 2020, the parties SHALL file a joint proposed protective order,” after which Defendants would be required to produce the insurance agreement in issue. (Id. at 8, emphasis in original.) To date, however, the parties have not filed a proposed protective order or requested an extension of time. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide: “Failure of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.