(HC)Hayes

(HC)Hayes v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 25, 20202:19-cv-01279California657 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLUFFORD HAYES, Jr., No. 2:19-cv-01279-TLN-EFB Petitioner, v. ORDER ROBERT NEUSCHMID, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Blufford Hayes Jr. (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se,1 has filed this Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 25, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 36.)

The Court notes Petitioner was briefly represented pro bono by counsel Richard Such (see ECF Nos. 16, 17), during which time, counsel for Petitioner filed the Amended Petition (ECF No. 26 18) that is the subject of the motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 31) and the Findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.