Elopre
Elopre v. Superior Court of California, County of Norwalk
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGELIO ELOPRE, 1:20-cv-01661-DAD-BAM
Plaintiff,
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE
v. CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF NORWALK et al., Doc. No. 1 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff Rogelio Elopre (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. (Doc. No. 1.) 19 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action, other than one based on diversity 20 jurisdiction, be brought only in “(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all 21 defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which 22 a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part 23 of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an 24 action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any 25 defendant is…