Marroquin

(PC) Gao v. Marroquin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20201:19-cv-00438California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON ZHANG GAO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00438-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE MARROQUIN, et al., (ECF No. 30) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Jason Zhang Gao (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds 19 against Defendant Marroquin (“Defendant”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. 20 All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 29.) 21 On October 21, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 30.) In 22 the motion, Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for 23 summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 24 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.