Marroquin
(PC) Gao v. Marroquin
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON ZHANG GAO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00438-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE MARROQUIN, et al., (ECF No. 30) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Jason Zhang Gao (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds 19 against Defendant Marroquin (“Defendant”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. 20 All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 29.) 21 On October 21, 2020, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 30.) In 22 the motion, Plaintiff was provided with notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for 23 summary judgment. Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 24 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1988); Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409,…