(SS) Hussain v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 30, 20202:18-cv-01136California1,368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN, No. 2:18-cv-1136 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff brought this action seeking judicial review of a final administrative decision denying an application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. On February 8, 2019, the court entered the parties’ stipulated remand of this action for further proceedings. (ECF No. 22.) Further administrative proceedings resulted in a fully favorable decision for plaintiff. (Pl.’s Mot. (ECF No. 27-1) at 2.)

1 Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on June 17, 2019. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on July 30, 2019). 25 Accordingly, Andrew Saul is substituted in as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.