Phi

(PC) Antonio Perez v. Phi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20201:20-cv-01248California3,950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ANTONIO PEREZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-01248-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

v. BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE BRYAN PHI, et al., A CLAIM 14 Defendants. (ECF NO. 1)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Antonio Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on September 3, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 10). The Court provided Plaintiff with applicable legal standards, explained why Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint. (Id.). The Court also gave Plaintiff the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.