Gooch

(PC) Hammler v. Gooch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20201:19-cv-00653California644 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 1:19-cv-00653-AWI-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (ECF No. 16) 11 GOOCH, et al., Defendants.

13 Allen Hammler (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 19, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 14). On June 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean entered findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims for deliberate indifference to a serious risk of harm against Defendants John Doe and Salcedo and Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment medical indifference claims against Defendants Salcedo, Gooch and Burnes should proceed past the screening stage. (ECF No. 16). Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations. On June 18 and 22, 2020, Plaintiff filed his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.