Daveiga

(PC) Navarro v. Daveiga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20201:20-cv-00810California418 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO LOUIS NAVARRO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00810-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS AND

v.

CLAIMS

CATE, et al., 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign a District Judge

17 On October 11, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s third amended complaint (Doc. 117) and found that it states cognizable claims of retaliation against Defendants Daveiga and Ruiz. (Doc. 268.) The Court found that the complaint’s remaining claims were not cognizable. (Id.) The Court therefore directed Plaintiff, within 21 days, to file a fourth amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his pleading or to notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable. (Id. at 10-11.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation “that this action proceed only on the claims found cognizable … and that all other claims and defendants be dismissed with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.