Baser

(PC) Payne v. Baser

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20202:20-cv-00553California557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVANCE PAYNE, No. 2:20-cv-0553 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. BASER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2020, the undersigned denied plaintiff’s August 10, 2020 motion for appointment of counsel on the grounds that this action was stayed and set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Claire on October 5, 2020. (ECF No. 24.) On October 5, 2020, the settlement conference was held. This action did not settle. On October 7, 2020, the undersigned lifted the stay in this action. (ECF No. 30.) On November 23, 2020, plaintiff filed a renewed motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 33.) On November 23, 2020, plaintiff also filed a “request for rehearing,” which the undersigned construes as further briefing in support of the renewed motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 34.) District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.