Santiago

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL ARZAGA, No. 2:18-cv-0313 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

E. SANTIAGO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis, but rather paid the court’s filing fee. Two motions by plaintiff are addressed by this order. Motion to Stay Discovery On October 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion to stay discovery pending his return from the Los Angeles County Jail for an alleged resentencing hearing. On October 23, 2020, pursuant to the court’s order, defendants Gisler and Pak filed a response confirming that no removal orders were pending for plaintiff, and no hearings were presently scheduled for plaintiff in the Los Angeles County Superior Court case. (ECF No. 59 at 1-2.) Moreover, plaintiff’s deposition was noticed for October 26, 2020, and because plaintiff was not being transferred, defendants 27 …