Lizarraga

(PC) Delgado v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 1, 20202:19-cv-01540California3,084 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH DELGADO, No. 2:19-cv-1540 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

JOE A. LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Defendants’ motion to compel responses to one set of a request for production of documents, and two sets of interrogatories, all propounded by defendants Barton and Scheurer, and plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel are before the court. As discussed below, the undersigned grants the motion to compel, denies the motion for appointment of counsel, and issues a revised scheduling order. I. Plaintiff’s Complaint This action proceeds on plaintiff’s complaint against defendants Barton, Negrete,1 and Scheurer, based on plaintiff’s claims that on April 4, 2017, at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”), such defendants used excessive force for no legitimate penological reason against plaintiff, resulting in physical injuries and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.