Dwivedi

(PC) Brookins v. Dwivedi

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20201:18-cv-00645California740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY L. BROOKINS, 1:18-cv-00645-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

vs. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANT

DWIVEDI ON PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL

RAJENDRA DWIVEDI, et al., CLAIM UNDER THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT, AND THAT ALL OTHER

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE

DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

19 Barry L. Brookins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on May 10, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) On July 8, 2019, the court screened the Complaint and found that it states a cognizable medical claim under the Eighth Amendment against defendant Dr. Rajendra Dwivedi, but no other claims. (ECF No. 25.) Defendant Dwivedi was served with process. On November 12, 2020, the court issued …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.