Martinez

Martinez v. National Credit Adjusters, L.L.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20201:20-cv-00773California170 words

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00773-NONE-HBK Plaintiff, V. ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV.

NATIONAL CREDIT ADJUSTERS, P. 41(a)(1)(A) Gi)

LLC.,

15 Defendant. 16 17 On November 10, 2020, the parties filed a Notice of Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with 18 Prejudice citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(@i), noting each party will bear their own respective 19 fees and costs. Accordingly, based on the parties’ Joint Stipulation under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)Gi), 20 this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 21 692 (9th Cir. 1997). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to assign this case to a district 22 judge and then to close this case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: _ December 2, 2020 ooo. Uh. Bareh Back

HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28