Mendoza

Mendoza v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20201:20-cv-01133California957 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIKA MENDOZA, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01133-DAD-BAM Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR

REDACTION

ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INC., et al., (Doc. No. 200) 15 Defendants.

17 On December 1, 2020, defendant Midea Microwave and Electrical Appliances Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (“Midea China”) filed a motion to dismiss in this action. (Doc. No. 199.) In connection with that motion, defendant filed an ex parte motion requesting a court order authorizing the redaction of documents in an exhibit to a declaration filed in support of its motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 200.) Defendant contends that filing a redacted version of the documents in question is warranted because they reflect trade secrets. According to defendant, the purchase orders at issue identify per unit pricing information between defendant Midea China and defendant Electrolux Home Products, Inc., information which is not otherwise publicly available. (Doc. No. 200…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.