Carbullido

(PC) Taylor v. Carbullido

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20202:19-cv-02550California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:19-cv-2550 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. CARBULLIDO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Plaintiff’s amended complaint is before the court for screening. Having conducted the required screening, the court finds that plaintiff may proceed on a claim arising under the First Amendment against defendants Hodgers and Carbullido with respect to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.